Monday, August 24, 2020

Legalization of Drugs Research Paper

Sanctioning of Drugs Research Paper Sanctioning of Drugs Research Paper Research Paper on Legalization of Drugs has a larger number of advantages than hurt: Presentation A medication is any substance that adjusts the ordinary organic elements of the body. Creation of Illegal medications is ordinarily precluded and their utilization is carefully controlled on the grounds that they can prompt enslavement or habituation. Medications, for example, heroin, cocaine, happiness, and weed can be amazingly risky if wrongly utilized and advantageous whenever put into right use. The issue of medication use and abuse has represented a genuine issue. Forbiddance of medication use has been at the focal point of conversation in different nations over the globe. Since this medications are currently on the hands of the nastiest lawbreakers everywhere throughout the world, control and guidelines are important. The main solution for this threat is full sanctioning joined by suitable controls. I completely bolster the movement that medications ought to be sanctioned since disallowance will deny the specialists the opportunity to teach the kids on appropriate utilization of the medications (Gargaro). The continuous discussion on sanctioning of medications is asking the administration whether it will help in tackling drug issues suitably. On the off chance that I were posed a comparative inquiry, I would state yes. This is on the grounds that the present preclusions on drugs are simply cleaning up the issue and not giving genuine arrangements. Authorization and tariffs are the main routes through which genuine arrangements can be accomplished. Simply think about this circumstance; something like each year in Britain, crooks control billions of pounds in the medication business rather than the administration and merchants through the bootleg market. This sort of business has energized worldwide fear based oppression, illicit weapons exchange, control on prostitution, and sexual subjection. Practically 50% of all the criminal offenses carried out in the nation are tranquilize related. Couldn’t decreasing these wrongdoings free our lawful administrations and detainment facilit ies at any rate for a second? Superfluous restrictions on medicate use has driven our youngsters into perpetrating drug related violations, and this has denied them the truly necessary guidance on drugs, other than subverting our regard for the law. The administration ought to subsequently make the conspicuous stride, put all the medications state control, and force enactment and assessments on their deal. This will calm our nation the weight of faltering under superfluous preclusions (Gray). Denials on medication and substance misuse, for example, liquor have been set up since the 1920s in the US and other created nations. It has caused individuals to accept that taking it is a crime, which can land somebody in prison. The evil impacts of the medications and liquor are so antagonistic to such an extent that no normal individual could get a kick out of the chance to be related with them by utilizing the medication. Such a large number of individuals are persuaded that these impacts are hurtful, and have effectively controlled from the propensity. It is a great idea to set up such a law in the general public, and most government has successfully controlled medication maltreatment since days of yore through preclusions. For instance, the liquor forbiddance demonstration of the 1920s demonstrated powerful in light of the fact that instances of liquor utilization significantly dropped despite the fact that it didn't prevail with regards to disposing of the liquor. The pace of wrongdoing and intoxication dropped and burdens were diminished by placing the guilty parties in prison. Minor wrongdoings, for example, vagrancy, open foulness, and jumbling have been effectively dispensed with use to these forbiddances. This is sufficient demonstrate that this strategy truly works (C.S). Denial of medication use in nations, for example, the United States, Britain, and different pieces of the bigger Europe has end up being worthless and the war on drugs in these social orders has made various damages the clients. Since disallowance is planned for expanding cost and punishment of a genuine medication propensity, it makes it excessively expensive for most people. Punishing the utilization of the medications drives the honest people into the criminal market economy. Condemning clients and disallowances opens them to wellbeing dangers that could have in any case been maintained a strategic distance from. Likewise, it doesn’t bode well to condemn a few medications while giving a free market to other people. This diverts consideration from lawful to those that are hurtful however legitimate, for example, liquor. The disallowance on drugs has never and will never work. This endeavor of attempting to prevent individuals their privilege from securing doing what they nee d with their bodies is destined to bomb as long as the individual utilizing the medication doesn't hurt their neighbor. The present technique that has for some time been utilized to battle the medication war is over the top expensive and has not yielded any important outcomes. It is a shortsighted arrangement that has from the beginning neglected to perceive the multifaceted nature encompassing the issue. It has additionally been unmindful of the perils a medication has on the person. Full scale sanctioning of the medication demonstration will empower the state to instruct the general population on dangers related with sedate use, and how such issues can be dealt with. While there is a likelihood that the demonstration of legitimization of medications will draw in more clients, their lives will be a lot more advantageous and more secure. Let us not get theoretical here, since we know about individuals who used to consume medications yet having sound existences. For example Barrack O bama to have taken Cocaine (Hope). The basic legend encompassing the entire thought of legitimizing drugs is that it will make individuals honest residents, and empower the administration to burden the business. Notwithstanding, I am uncertain about whether the cartels will be naã ¯ve enough to permit the administration takes over such a rewarding business. On the off chance that the cigarette showcase has had the option to dodge the government’s burdening framework, shouldn't something be said about this industry that has an intricate system of makers and illicit providers in the market? Authorizing and burdening drugs as some contend isn't an answer for the medication threat on the planet today. The explanation is that the bootleg market will be given a simple way to groove is on the grounds that the demonstration will be made socially worthy. It will be a lot simpler to take these substances to the market under the legitimization go about instead of government controlled outlets. This would likewise build f inancing for the wrongdoing in light of the fact that the medications will be effortlessly gotten to by clients who can thusly bait non-clients since there are no laws disallowing the demonstration. What are the outcomes? The medications will circle in the general public, crush more lives, tear families, and cause individuals to be rough. Regardless of whether the present war on drugs isn't viable, legitimizing drugs is a lot of more terrible and ought not be passed into law (James). End The war on sedate has brought more damage than anything else, and the arrangement on tranquilize use has neglected to ensure the individuals it is expected to. In Mexico alone, the war on sedate approach has guaranteed near 14,000 lives since 2006. This figure doesn't anyway incorporate those individuals who have been damaged, injured or dislodged. Forbiddances on medicate use have brought about wars between the power and the clients in many urban communities over the world, and this fight appears not to be reaching a conclusion at any point in the near future. The war on medication ought to in this manner, be halted and clear route for the legislature to force control quantifies and sanction the entire business. I bolster this movement since I accept that the results of such a move would be valuable, both for the state itself and in the battle against worldwide medications wrongdoing. At you can purchase explore papers on Legalization of Drugs. All custom research papers are composed without any preparation. High caliber and opportune conveyance ensure!

Saturday, August 22, 2020

Positive and Negative Environmental effects of Genetically Modified Research Paper

Positive and Negative Environmental impacts of Genetically Modified Crops - Research Paper Example In any case, various protests have been raised. This paper looks at the positive and negative ecological impacts of hereditarily adjusted yields. While hereditarily adjusted yields have consistently picked up help there exists a solid unexpected of gatherings that item to these harvests on ecological reasons. Inside this unexpected the absolute most grounded complaints have been imposed by bunches worried about ecological maintainability just as strict gatherings that article to hereditary alteration on moral grounds. All things considered, it’s away from developing assemblage of research has highlighted significant ecological worries from actualizing hereditarily changed harvests. In this setting of understanding, one of the dominating concerns is unintended mischief to encompassing yields and living beings. For example, an ongoing report showed that, â€Å"pollen from B.t. corn caused high death rates in ruler butterfly caterpillars† (‘Transgenic Pollen’, pg. 214). While this examination was not led in normal conditions, different specialists have contended comparative disputes. In such matters, it’s been noticed that dust and other hereditarily changed yield outgrowth holds a solid potential for spreading to encompassing territories and adversely influencing the life-pattern of an assortment of life forms. Another conspicuous natural concern identified with the utilization of hereditarily changed yields is the revealed capability of quality exchange to non-target species. Basically this worry shows that crops that have been hereditarily adjusted for rigid protection from climate conditions or different territories of hindrance will move their harvest protection from less alluring outgrowth. For example, â€Å"crop plants designed for herbicide resilience and weeds will cross-breed, bringing about the exchange of the herbicide obstruction qualities from the harvests off course. These superweeds would then be herbicide lenien t as well† (Whitman). These worries have developed in various genuine settings, with claims rising in circumstances where adjoining hereditarily adjusted yield land have supposedly tainted non-changed harvests. Another conspicuous worry around there of comprehension is the concern of the diminished viability of pesticides. This worry accepts an assortment of structures as ranchers of non-hereditarily altered yields stress that new types of creepy crawlies may develop in light of hereditarily changed harvests that are then altogether impervious to conventional types of pesticides. While there have been an assortment of proposed answers for the previously mentioned ecological concerns, it’s clear that at any rate in the present innovative condition they stay practical concerns for ranchers not legitimately associated with the creation of hereditarily altered strains of harvest. Indeed, even as significant natural protests exist to hereditarily adjusted yields, scientists note that there is extensive ecological help for this method of farming creation. One of the major noted natural advantages for ranchers is the expanded vermin obstruction of hereditarily altered yields. One of the essential regions where such hereditary alteration has tremendously affected cultivating is in creating districts. In these territories, â€Å"agricultural creation doesn't simply work as a methods for monetary benefit, however is intermittently personally connected to the population’

Saturday, July 18, 2020

How to Reduce Sexual Side Effects From Antidepressants

How to Reduce Sexual Side Effects From Antidepressants Depression Treatment Medication Print How to Reduce Sexual Side Effects From Antidepressants Coping When Your Libido Takes a Hit By Nancy Schimelpfening Nancy Schimelpfening, MS is the administrator for the non-profit depression support group Depression Sanctuary. Nancy has a lifetime of experience with depression, experiencing firsthand how devastating this illness can be. Learn about our editorial policy Nancy Schimelpfening Medically reviewed by Medically reviewed by Daniel B. Block, MD on January 24, 2020 twitter linkedin Daniel B. Block, MD, is an award-winning, board-certified psychiatrist who operates a private practice in Pennsylvania. Learn about our Medical Review Board Daniel B. Block, MD Updated on February 04, 2020 Depression Overview Types Symptoms Causes & Risk Factors Diagnosis Treatment Coping ADA & Your Rights Depression in Kids Noel HendricksonCollection / Photographers Choice RF / Getty Images Loss of sexual desire and difficulties performing during intimate encounters can be symptoms of depression, but they can also be side effects of many medications used to treat depression. While antidepressants are often integral to managing depression, sexuality is an important piece of a healthy life for many people. Experiencing sexual side effects from antidepressants can be frustrating and disheartening, but there are ways to address them.   Talking openly with a partner, doctor, or mental health care provider about sex may feel daunting, but it’s the first step to finding solutions. Here’s what you need to know about how depression and its treatment can affect your sex life, as well as some potential ways to address these challenges.   Coping With Sexual Side Effects of Antidepressants Depression and antidepressant medications can cause symptoms such as low libido, vaginal dryness, and erectile dysfunction.?? People may also find it more difficult to have an orgasm, or may not have orgasms at all.     Research indicates these sexual side effects are quite common.?? In fact, a 2002 meta-analysis of more than 14,000 people found that a diagnosis of depression carries a 50% to 70% risk for developing sexual dysfunction. The risk was slightly increased in people who were taking antidepressants (71% vs. 65% in people who were not being treated).   Sexual dysfunction related to depression may be even more prevalent than the statistics show. People may feel embarrassed and reluctant to report sexual problems to their doctor or psychiatrist. Even when they do share these side effects, a connection between the changes in their sex life and depression or medication may not be made.     If you are experiencing sexual dysfunction, you can take the first step toward addressing it by acknowledging it exists and speaking up about it to your partner, as well as your doctor or therapist. Communication will be very importantâ€"not just with your partner, but with your health care team. For example, if you are considering a different medication, want to change your dose, or add a supplement, always talk to your doctor and/or psychiatrist before making changes.   While these approaches can be a helpful place to start, they may not work for everyone. You may need to try more than one before you find something that effectively addresses your symptoms.??   Ask About a Lower Dose With your doctors guidance, you may be able to take a lower dose of your antidepressant. Some people find this change is enough to reduce the sexual side effects while still effectively treating their depression.   Research has shown that some people with depression prescribed a standard dose of 20 milligrams of Prozac (fluoxetine) per day felt their symptoms were as well-managed when they only took 5â€"10mg a day. Plus, they experienced fewer side effects on a lower dose.   Have Sex Before You Take Your Pill The timing of when you take your antidepressant may make a difference in your sex drive as well. Waiting until after you’ve had sex to take medications like Zoloft (sertraline) or tricyclic antidepressants may help reduce the sexual side effects, as you’re engaging in intimacy when the levels of the drugs in your body are lowest.   Deciding when to take your medication will depend on many factors, such as your daily routine or other side effects you experience (such as nausea, which may be reduced if you take your pill with food, or trouble sleeping). When you’re deciding when to take your pill, make sure to factor your pattern of sexual activity into your scheduling. If you are most likely to have sex in the evening, it may help if you take your pill in the morning.   What Time of Day Should You Take Antidepressants? Try Meds That Treat Sexual Dysfunction Certain types of antidepressant medications may be less likely to have sexual side effects.   Wellbutrin (bupropion), a norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NDRI), works in a different way than selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) like Prozac, Zoloft, and Paxil (paroxetine). For some people experiencing sexual side effects when taking SSRIs, switching to an NDRI like Wellbutrin is enough to solve the problem.   In some cases, your doctor may want you to continue taking the medication you were originally prescribed for depression but add Wellbutrin as well.   They may also recommend drugs that are specifically designed to treat sexual dysfunction. Research has shown that in addition to antidepressants, people who experience erectile dysfunction can benefit from medications such as Viagra (sildenafil) or Cialis (tadalafil) that are targeted to treat the disorder.  ?? Does Zoloft Cause Erectile Dysfunction? Take a Medication Holiday If your doctor would prefer to stay on the same dose of your medication, you may be able to talk to them about taking periodic breaks or drug holidays. Some people find that scheduling a day or two off from taking certain antidepressants, such as Zoloft and Paxil, allows them to get relief from the side effects without interrupting the therapeutic benefits.   However, this strategy may not work with every antidepressant. Prozac, for example, has a much longer half-life than most antidepressants, which means the level of the drug remains consistent in your body for an extended period of time after you stop taking it.   While the drug’s long half-life can be beneficial when you’re trying to stop or switch antidepressants (as it makes withdrawal symptoms less likely), it also makes taking a “holiday” from the medication more difficult.     Experiment With Alternatives If you’ve tried making adjustments to your antidepressant or switching meds but the sexual side effects persist, you may want to shift your focus to other approaches.   Methods for addressing the sexual side effects of antidepressants can also help if the symptoms you’re experiencing are being caused by depression. You may find these strategies even help you better manage your depression overall.   Psychotherapy, acupuncture, nutritional supplements, and other alternatives may be worth trying. You can also encourage your partner to get in on some of these lifestyle changes. You might try exercising together to gear up for sex or incorporate new types of stimulation into your routine.     Consider Other Causes If you’ve tried to address your sexual symptoms with multiple methods and aren’t seeing any improvement, it may be that there’s another cause.   There are many psychological and physical ailments that can affect your sexuality other than depression and medications. Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) is a common, but not frequently discussed, sexual health condition.?? People with HSDD (now split into two disorders in the DSM-5: female sexual interest/arousal disorder and male hypoactive sexual desire disorder) experience no drive for sexual or intimate experiences. A person with HSDD does not pursue sexual closeness and many do not think or fantasize about sex. Low libido or lack of interest in sex is not always experienced as a problem; in fact, it can be a valid sexual identity for some people (asexuality).  However, this is not the case for people with HSDD. People with the condition are distressed by their lack of desire,?? which they often report has a profoundly negative impact on their relationships.   An Overview of Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder Sexual dysfunction can also be caused by certain behaviors. If you use alcohol or other substances, sexual side effects may be felt when youre using and/or when you are withdrawing. Age-related changes, chronic illness or pain, and life stressors (such as having a new baby or starting a new job) can also impact your sex life. These factors may make it more challenging to cope with sexual side effects caused by depression or medications. How Stress Can Cause a Low Libido Talking With Your Partner   Communication is an important part of a healthy relationship, but when you and your partner are dealing with sexual difficulties, it’s even more important that you can talk to each other.   Discussing these topics may be emotionally intense and will require both of you to find (or make) time for the conversation, but its important that you do. Maintaining open dialogue is part of keeping your relationship strong. Together, you and your partner can create a space in which you both feel safe expressing your feelings. By the end of the talk, you will each ideally come away feeling heard, understood, and that you have the other persons love and support. Every couple has their own way of communicating and each person in the relationship has a different style of expressing how they feel.   Your individual emotional and sexual needs (as well as those of your partner) are unique, but you may find these general guidelines can help you both communicate more effectively.   Don’t stay silent. You might be hesitant to acknowledge the difficulties, but you won’t be able to work toward a solution until they are out in the open and up for discussion. Talking with your doctor or therapist first can help you figure out how to best approach the conversation with your partner when you’re ready.  Avoid blame. Whether you are experiencing the symptoms of sexual dysfunction yourself or you are the partner of someone who is, do your best to keep blame out of the conversation. Avoid placing blame on the other person, but also resist the urge to blame yourself.  Be honest. It can be difficult to express disappointment and frustration in a relationship, but these feelings can be even more sensitive when they’re about sex. You might think that keeping these emotions from your partner is saving their feelings, but ignoring your own emotional needs or playing them down isn’t healthy for you or your relationship.Work together. Depression can make someone feel ve ry alone. When you love someone who is depressed you may feel isolated from them. If you and your partner are trying to work through sexual difficulties in your relationship that are stemming from depression, approach the problem solving from a team perspective rather than an individual perspective. Remember that you are in it together. Reinforce your partnership often and in ways that are separate from sex.  Ask for help. If you are struggling to communicate, you and your partner may benefit from relationship counseling. Having a trusted therapist create a safe space to openly share feelings and work on a problem can make all the difference to couples who have had a hard time figuring it out on their own. A therapist can also act as a moderator and make sure each person gets a chance to share feelings and offer ideas. A therapist’s own knowledge and experience can also make them an invaluable resource for possible solutions.   How to Have the Sex Talk With Your Partner

Thursday, May 21, 2020

Descartes Method of Doubt Essay - 2584 Words

Descartes Method of Doubt In this essay I will assess Descartess employment of his Method of Doubt, as presented in his Meditations on the First Philosophy [Descartes 1641]. I will argue that by implicitly accepting a causal model of perception, Descartes did not apply the Method of Doubt as fully as he could have. The Method of Doubt Descartess principal task in the Meditations was to devise a system that would bring him to the truth. He wanted to build a foundational philosophy; a basic edifice from which all further intellectual enquiry could be built. It was essential that his foundational beliefs were sound. If any one of them were at all in doubt, then it put the credibility of the whole structure of knowledge in†¦show more content†¦The underlying principle behind Descartess sceptical approach is that there is a distinction between belief and truth. For example, having made a pot of tea five minutes ago, I may well believe that it is now full and ready to pour. But in truth, perhaps, someone else may already have drunk the tea and emptied the pot while I was out of the kitchen waiting for it to brew. Although I think this is unlikely, and I continue to believe the pot is full of tea, I cannot be sure of it. Thus it is possible that I may believe something, but to my surprise find that it is not tru e. This situation is not inconsistent. The Method of Doubt ultimately involves the task of removing all uncertain beliefs, ensuring that only beliefs that are certainly true beliefs remain in ones philosophy. Descartes states in the first paragraph of Meditation 1 that I had accepted, even from my youth, many false opinions for true, and that consequently what I afterwards based on such principles was highly doubtful; and ... I was convinced of the necessity of undertaking ... to rid myself of all the opinions I had adopted. Descartes saw that the Method of Doubt could be applied, generally, to a whole class of beliefs. Thus he would not have to indulge in the laborious endeavour of checking each and every one of his beliefs, separately. Instead, he could deal with them in groups by doubting any common characteristic that they may share. Nor for this purpose will it be necessaryShow MoreRelatedDescartes Method Of Doubt Essay1881 Words   |  8 PagesQuestion: Describe Descartes’ â€Å"method of doubt.† What beliefs does Descartes think survive his method of doubt? Do you agree with his arguments? Renà © Descartes (1556-1650) considered a rationalist claims that before we can describe reality or what it means to exist, one must know what reality and existence is. Descartes proposed that it is pointless to claim something is real without justification. However for something to be justified it must be also be indubitable. In [Renà © Descartes, Meditation IRead MoreDescartes Method Of Radical Doubt1819 Words   |  8 PagesDescartes’ method of radical doubt focuses upon finding the truth about certain things from a philosophical perspective in order to truly lay down a foundation for ideas that have the slightest notion of doubt attached to them. He believed that there was â€Å"no greater task to perform in philosophy, than assiduously to seek out, once and for all, the best of all these arguments and to lay them out so precisely and plainly that henceforth all will take them to be true demonstrations† (Meditations, 36)Read MoreA Method of Doubt and Descartes E ssay3440 Words   |  14 PagesA Method of Doubt and Descartes In his first meditation, Descartes sets out with amazing clarity and persistence to clear himself of every false idea that he has acquired previous to this, and determine what he truly knows. To rid him of these rotten apples he has developed a method of doubt with a goal to construct a set of beliefs on foundations which are indubitable. On these foundations, Descartes applies three levels of skepticism, which in turn, generate three levels at which our thoughtsRead MoreDescarte and Pierce Essay examples1350 Words   |  6 PagesDescartes and Peirce both believe in belief and doubt. However, Peirce argument and determination to find a solution to overcome doubt is much stronger than Descartes’. Peirce also makes it known that he is aware of belief in which Descartes does not. Their beliefs result from the notion of clear and distinct ideas. Peirce and Descartes are both rationalists who believe that there is an independent truth and they know it when they see it. The problem that exists is that Descartes and Peirce realizeRead MoreDescartes : Synopsis Of Meditations 1987 Words   |  4 Pages Descartes: Synopsis of meditations 1, 2, 3 (p530-546) In what follows, I will summarize and come up with some explications to the first three meditations covered by Descartes. The first deals with the method of doubt, the second deals with the human mind and body, and finally the third with the existence of God. I will summarize these parts separately, in that order. In the first meditation, the meditator, who’s Descartes, introduces us with â€Å"the method of doubt†. What is the method of doubtRead MoreA Brief Look at the Philosophy of Descartes Essay823 Words   |  4 PagesWhen Descartes created the Method of Doubt his main mission was to develop a method that would bring him to the real truth. It was important that his initial beliefs were absolute. If any of them were in doubt, then it put the entire structure of knowledge at risk. Thus, Descartes developed a method to get rid of those beliefs of which he could not be completely being confident in them. This process is called the Method of Doubt. The first action to do while using the Method of Doubt is using theRead MoreEssay about Descartes discourse on method931 Words   |  4 Pages Understanding Descartes’ Method of Doubt Clear your mind, if you will, of everything you have ever seen or known to be true. To begin understanding Rene Descartes’ method of doubt, you need to suspend all prejudice and prior judgments and start with a clean slate â€Å"for the purpose of discovering some ultimate truth on which to base all thought.† (Kolak, Pg.225). Discouraged with much skepticism from his own beliefs, Descartes was embarrassed of his own ignorance. He set out to try and accomplishRead MoreDescartes Discourse on Method931 Words   |  4 PagesUnderstanding Descartes Method of Doubt Clear your mind, if you will, of everything you have ever seen or known to be true. To begin understanding Rene Descartes method of doubt, you need to suspend all prejudice and prior judgments and start with a clean slate for the purpose of discovering some ultimate truth on which to base all thought. (Kolak, Pg.225). Discouraged with much skepticism from his own beliefs, Descartes was embarrassed of his own ignorance. He set out to try and accomplishRead MoreAnalysis Of Rene Descartes s Meditations On First Philosophy 1399 Words   |  6 PagesEssay 1 Rene Descartes was born in in La Haye, France, in 1596 and he studied at La Fleche Jesuit College and University of Poitiers. Descartes also lived in Germany, Holland and Sweden. He then worked in the army as a private councillor and then as a court philosopher. Descartes book ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’ was first published in 1641. The edition used to write this essay was edited by John Cottingham and was published by the Cambridge University Press in 1996. Descartes was the firstRead MoreDiscourse on Descartes Skeptical Method1672 Words   |  7 PagesSebastian Gumina Paper Topic #1 Descartes’ Skeptical Method Descartes’ method offers definitive conclusions on certain topics, (his existence, the existence of God)but his reasoning is not without error. He uses three arguments to prove existence (His and God’s) that attempt to solidify his conclusions. For his method to function seamlessly, Descartes needs to be consistent in his use of the method, that is, he must continue to doubt and challenge thoughts that originate in his own

Wednesday, May 6, 2020

Sympathy in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Essay - 2937 Words

Sympathy in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein In her novel, Frankenstein, Mary Shelley employs many innovative literary techniques to invoke feelings of sympathy for the monster. Sympathy is created by the author both by making the readers pity the monster’s loathsome existence and by leading them to understand his violent and cruel actions. We pity the creature because of the way he is treated by mankind and we can identify with his feelings and reactions and understand why he behaves as he does. Shelley uses different narrators throughout the novel and the reader sympathises with the views of these people to differing degrees. The language used when describing the physical appearance of the monster and his feelings is very†¦show more content†¦The setting in the Arctic wastelands is harsh, cold and alien. Walton appears to be a very decent and trustworthy person and the reader is led to believe his initial impressions of Victor Frankenstein as the innocent victim of terrible circumstances to be correct. Later Victor Frankenstein tells his story to Walton and the reader is introduced to the world of Victor, the privileged child of loving parents who goes to university and becomes a passionate, introverted young man. He became utterly single-minded in his quest to create ‘an animal as complex and wonderful as man’. We feel his sense of despair and horror when he first views his creation, which he calls a ‘catastrophe’. The descriptions the author uses are very strong and powerful, ‘yellow skin’, ‘watery eyes’, ‘dun-white sockets’, ‘shrivelled complexion’ and ‘straight black lips’. This truly seems to be a horrific sight. Victor tells of the ‘demoniacal corpse to which I had so miserably given life’. Yet we know that this is indeed Victor’s creation and we feel sympathy for the creature that through no fault of its own had been brought into existence. The more Victor tells of his loathing and disgust for the monster, the more the feelings of pity and sympathy are stirred in the reader for this poor, hideous, unloved creature. The setting was very important for the scene of when the monster was brought to life - it wasShow MoreRelated Sympathy in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Essay3354 Words   |  14 PagesSympathy in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Mary Shelley was born in 1797. She had a difficult life with many family upsets’, miscarriages and suffered personal depression; she died aged 53. Mary Shelley wrote Frankenstein firstly as a short ghost story but it was published as a novel in 1816. Frankenstein is a Gothic novel and it deals with two genres, Gothicism and science fiction. Gothicism is part of the Romantic Movement that started in the late eighteenth century. The Romantic MovementRead MoreEssay Readers Sympathies in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein1587 Words   |  7 PagesReaders Sympathies in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Frankenstein a gothic horror, written by Mary Shelley in 1818, can be interpreted as a subtle autobiography; whose narrative reflects on the characters throughout the story. It was written at the time where the Romantic period replaced the age of reason, the time where dreams and ideas replaced logic and science. The two main characters in the story, Victor and the monster are used as metaphors for this. Shelley usesRead MoreEssay about Sympathy in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein986 Words   |  4 PagesSympathy in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Frankenstein for many people is a huge fiendish monster, a brainless oaf with a couple of neck bolts, who is a horrible murderer. This image has been created by Boris Karloff and other television/film images. I also thought like that, believing Frankenstein to be a monstrous murderer, so when I was met with the text I was surprised to find as a mad scientist who creates a monster. This changed my opinion greatly at first. Read MoreSympathy For The Monster In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein887 Words   |  4 Pagesseveral times I had sympathy for the monster in the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley. Victor came from a privileged family and decided he wanted to play god, which is when he created the monster. It was selfish of Victor to create the monster and leave without explaining the world it. After reading this essay I think you will also have sympathy for the monster. Sympathy is when you have feelings of pity or sorrow towards someones misfortune (Oxford Dictionaries, 1998). I had sympathy for the monsterRead MoreFrankenstein: Mary Shelleys Ability to Create Sympathy for the Monster1851 Words   |  8 PagesMary Shelley’s Frankenstein is ‘one of the pioneering works of modern science fiction’, and is also a frightening story that speaks to the ‘mysterious fears of our nature’. Mary Shelley mocks the idea of â€Å"playing God†, the idea that came from the Greek myth of Prometheus, of the Greek titan who stole Zeus’ gift of life. Both the story of Frankenstein and Prometheus reveal the dark side of human nature and the dangerous effects of creating artificial life. Frankenstein reveals the shocking realityRead MoreCreation of Sympathy For The Monster In Vol Chapter 5 and Vol Chapter 7 In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein820 Words   |  4 PagesCreation of Sympathy For The Monster In Vol Chapter 5 and Vol C hapter 7 In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Sympathy is created for the monster in chapter five and chapter seven in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein by a variety of methods. These methods are utilised and explored deeply throughout the novel. Initially, Shelley introduces the creation of Frankensteins monster, through the viewpoint of Dr Frankenstein himself. This first interpretation of him is very descriptive andRead MoreSympathy And Sympathy In Frankenstein1525 Words   |  7 PagesTo be able to feel sympathy, humans first must be able to read into and understand another’s emotions. Mary Shelley uses this human aspect in her novel Frankenstein, as readers’ emotions are played. Set in the early 1900s, the novel is a recount of Victor Frankenstein’s life as he tells it to Robert Walter, a man leading an exploration to the North Pole. Frankenstein starts his narrative explaining how he was a very curious child, and eventually went off to college and conducted an experiment onRead More The Role of Women in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Essay1434 Words   |  6 PagesThe Role of Women in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Whether an author is conscious of the fact or not, a fictional work cannot avoid reflecting the political, social, economic, and religious background of the author. Therefore, regardless of Frankensteins categorization being that of science fiction, Mary Shelley reveals her own fears and thoughts, and, as a result, reveals a great deal about the time and place in which she wrote. She mentions specific geographical locations throughoutRead MoreThe Most Sympathetic Character in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein1336 Words   |  6 PagesMost Sympathetic Character in Mary Shelleys Frankenstein Frankenstein was written in 1816 by Mary Shelley when she was eighteen years old. Her early life mirrored some of the main parts of the story. For example Victor Frankensteins mother died when he was seventeen of scarlet fever and Mary Shelleys mother died in childbirth. This shows a correlation between their pasts as both of their mothers died when they were quite young Mary Shelleys fathers second wife discardedRead MoreThe Tragedy Of Frankenstein And His Creature1158 Words   |  5 PagesAlejandra Guevara Ms. Garcia AP English Lit 3 12/14/16 The Tragedy of Frankenstein and his Creature Ever since its inception in 1818, Mary Shelley’s ‘Frankenstein’ has fueled the imaginations of thousands of readers through its portrayal of conflicted scientist Victor Frankenstein, and his neglected creation — referred to as the Creature in its first appearances, and later called the Monster. Though rich in storytelling, perhaps ‘Frankenstein’s most enduring quality is its wide array of themes

Rainbow’s End †Belonging Free Essays

â€Å"At the heart of any individual journey is the tension between belonging and not belonging. † Psychologist Abraham Maslow constructed a theory of self-identity. He believed that for one to understand themselves that had to achieve a true sense of belonging. We will write a custom essay sample on Rainbow’s End – Belonging or any similar topic only for you Order Now The concept of belonging is explored through Jane Harrisons, ‘Rainbow’s End’, as well as Rachel Perkins television drama ‘Redfern Now’ episode ‘Stand Up’. Both texts represent belonging and not belonging through place, family and community. Each text emphasises on the tension between belonging and not belonging from the aspect of an individual’s journey. A Place is an essential part of belonging. Aboriginals believe that they do not own the land, that they are a part of it. However European settlement didn’t respect the Aboriginal culture and values. Despite constant issues between indigenous and non-indigenous land rights and owner ship the indigenous population still have a strong connect with land and thus, place. In ‘Rainbow’s End’ the Dear family live in a humpy on the river bank, which is prone to flooding. Despite the troubles with their home, Dolly is proud to be from the flats. I’m from the flats, not even one of those townie types of cross-over aboriginals†. This quote communicates how proud Dolly is of her Aboriginal culture and that she feels connected to it by where she lives. In ‘Redfern Now’, the representation about place is completely different. Clifton Grammar is a privileged private school, in North Sydney. The school is a symbol of upper white class society. The school is often showed as a low angle shot, this highlights power and authority because the angles of the camera make the school seem larger. A completely different shot is used to show Joel in this very scene. After the low angle shot of the school, there is a high angle shot of Joel. High angle shots express a lack of power by making Joel look smaller, especially when compared to the intimidating school. This emphasises the substantial difference between the rich white private school and Joel’s aboriginal culture, as well as his life in Redfern. Family can provide the deepest form of belonging. The Dear family do not refer to home as a place, home is the connections that all three women share with each other and ancestral past. Dolly’s connection with her family is highlighted in the end of scene thirteen, act 1. Errol asks Dolly to move to the city with him, where he wants to have a future with her and spoil her. She refuse’s and Errol can’t understand why, she explains â€Å"But†¦ a real home? A real home is where there are people looking out for each other. † Unlike Errol Dolly is extremely close to her family and Errol fails to see that family is Dolly’s definition of belonging. The difference in Joel’s family opinion is massive. Joel’s mother wants him to fit in at Clifton Grammar because it is such as privilege to attend the school and the opportunities the school will provide will set Joel up for life. However Joel’s father wants Joel to stick to his aboriginal morals, therefore not standing up and signing the Australian national anthem during assembly. This is represented by costuming and dialog. Joel’s mother says â€Å"you look very handsome in your uniform – it suits you. † Compared to Joel’s father saying â€Å"You look good, you look deadly. If you were going to court. † Both these quotes are said while Joel is in his uniform, highlighting the difference of opinion. Dealing with the pressure from both parents, this puts Joel in an awkward position. The tension between parents is related to belonging and not belonging because only one parent will accept his decision, therefore the other will not feel as appreciated because Joel has rebelled against their beliefs and values. Nan Dear and Gladys represent a different form of community. Nan Dear represents the Indigenous community, believing that the substantial difference between Indigenous Australians and White Australians should remain. Unlike Gladys who wants both cultures to combined to make a society in which everyone is equal. Each character tries to manipulate Dolly into sharing their beliefs. Nan Dear reminds Dolly of want white people have done to the Aboriginal community â€Å"and hospital is where they take our babies away. † This quote scratches the surface of the issues of the stolen generation, therefore this quote creates an allusion of the historical problem. Unlike Nan Dear Gladys looks towards the future is a positive light. To help Dolly fit into the white community she tries to get her a job at the bank. While talking to the bank manager Gladys wears white gloves through the technique of costuming this expresses her trying to fit into the white community. Similarly, Joel becomes an outcast from the Redfern community because he is attending Clifton Grammar. This concept is captured through costuming. While Joel is walking to school he is joined by to boys that give him a hard time because of what he is wearing compared to their casual public school uniform. Even though Joel does no longer belong to the Redfern community, he doesn’t belong to the school community either. This is because he refuses to stand up and sign the Australian national anthem. This is similar to Gladys, this creates tension between belonging and not belonging because of the divided culture and race of indigenous and non-indigenous Australians. Each text demonstrates the importance of belonging and the reality of not belonging. Even though both texts are set in different decades the difference between Indigenous Australians and White Australians are extremely noticeable in both. All characters in ‘Rainbow’s End’ and ‘Redfern Now’ deal with tension between belonging and not belonging through place, family and community. How to cite Rainbow’s End – Belonging, Essay examples

Sunday, April 26, 2020

Teachings of Hebrew Wisdom

The Bible covers all aspects of human life. Christians always refer to the teachings in the Bible when coming up with their decisions. The book of Proverbs covers the teachings of Hebrew wisdom on contemporary issues such as relationships, marriage, wealth, family, and self-control (Hindson, 2003).Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Teachings of Hebrew Wisdom specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More Solomon, the author of the book, associates diligence with terms such as riches, abundance, busy, power, and wisdom (Yates Hindson, 2012). In the book of Proverbs, Solomon contrasts diligence with laziness under several circumstances. The book presents wisdom as the best virtue. In the book, Solomon illustrates that folly is as an act of making uninformed decisions. According to him, a foolish person is aware of the advantages of making wise decisions, but always chooses to ignore and makes imprudent choices. All through the bo ok of Proverbs, connections between diligence and laziness have been highlighted. The book of proverbs differentiates diligence from laziness. Equally, the book differentiates wisdom from folly. In Proverbs 6:6-8, Solomon makes a clear contrast between diligence and laziness while depicting the difference between wise and folly. In the book, Solomon states, â€Å"Ants do not have a ruler or a commander yet they collect enough food in summer† (Rapids, 2002). Here, ants are depicted as diligent creatures since they collect food without being forced by a commander. Solomon implies that the ants collect food with no supervision because they are diligent. Equally, the scripture illustrates that ants are wise because they know that food is plenty in the summer and not in winter. On proverbs 26:14, diligence is contrasted with laziness (Rapids, 2002). In this verse, Solomon asserts that a sluggish person sleeps in bed when he or she is supposed to be working. The sluggard is compare d to a door hinge, which works only under the force of the person closing or opening the door. In this verse, the sluggard person has been contrasted with productive ants who work tirelessly during summer. The sluggard sleeping individual vividly illustrates the opposite of diligent person. The verse portrays sluggard persons as fools because they opt to stay in bed instead of working to earn a living.Advertising Looking for essay on religion theology? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Another aspect of human life that depicts the contrast between diligence and laziness is the aspirations and dreams in life. The verse that supports these Hebrew teachings is proverbs 21:25 (Rapids, 2002). In the verse, Solomon states that a person’s dreams are only achieved through hard work and diligence. He affirms that it is not possible to dream of big things and hope to realize it with no efforts put in place. In the scenario, he emp hasizes that a sluggard person’s dream will never be fulfilled because they spend their days in bed instead of working. In the same verse, Solomon teaches that lazy people are not diligent. He contrasts their laziness with the ants’ diligence and wise decisions. He states that ants benefit from their wisdom and diligence, while the sluggard persons are faced with a series of failures due to their laziness and foolish behaviors. There are several other verses Proverbs that support the teachings of wisdom, diligence, laziness, and folly as illustrated in the Hebrew customs. For instance, Proverbs 13:14 and 12:5 illustrates that a diligent person is abundantly rich (Rapids, 2002). The diligent person never lacks the resources in life. The person is able to make the right decisions towards achieving dreams and aspirations of life. Proverbs 12:11 points out clearly that any person who works in the land gets plenty of food, unlike the lazy person. The verse emphasizes on the importance of being diligent. Diligent persons are always diligent and spend their time amassing resources. Therefore, they always reap abundant harvest. Another scenario where a diligent person is depicted to have rewards in contrast with lazy and folly person is illustrated in Proverbs 31:27 and 12:24 (Rapids, 2002). The verses clearly state that diligent individuals who never associate themselves with the idlers always find themselves in the leadership positions. In addition, the verses maintain that the hand of the diligent person rules. Through the verses, the book of Proverbs affirms that diligent persons have several rewards compared to the lazy individuals, as demonstrated in various circumstances. The book as referred the lazy individuals with phrases such as poverty-stricken, shame, lack of satisfaction and lack of sense. The book associates these situations with lazy and folly individuals. Conventionally, society perceives laziness with shame and sees it as the main caus e of poverty. Families faced with poverty always make foolish decisions. As such, they engage in alcohol consumption, drug abuse, and poor budgeting. The above actions depict that they lack wisdom and diligence required for any individual to succeed.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Teachings of Hebrew Wisdom specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More In conclusion, it should be noted that the teachings of Hebrew wisdom show that diligence involves working hard to achieve our goals, while laziness is illustrated as an act of being sluggish with no efforts of achieving something. The book of Proverbs presents diligence as being aware of everything. On the other hand, being folly is illustrated as being ignorant of important issues in life. Generally, the book shows that diligence has rewards while laziness has negative consequences. References Hindson, E. E. (2003). Courageous faith: life lessons from Old Testament heroes. Chattanooga, Tenn.: AMG Publishers. Rapids, M. (2002). Holy Bible: King James Version.. Grand Rapids, Mich.: Zondervan. Yates, G., Hindson, E. E. (2012). The Essence of the Old Testament: a survey. Nashville, Tenn.: B H Academic. This essay on Teachings of Hebrew Wisdom was written and submitted by user Skyler Miles to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.